Trang Ánh Nam

CNN’s chief White House correspondent opened with a question about whether Trump tried to block AT&T’s merger with Time Warner. After Sanders said she was not aware of any such conversation, Acosta circled back to the situation with “Democrats and Jewish people,” asking if Trump’s rhetoric is “beneath” the American people. “Do you think that the president has thought, at all, going into the 2020 campaign that the rhetoric just needs to be lowered? Whether it’s talking about Democrats, the media, immigrants, or should we just plan on hearing the president use the same kind of language that we heard in 2016 and all through the first couple years of this administration?” Acosta asked. Sanders responded that it’s a shame Democrats won’t come together and condemn anti-Semitic remarks. “I think that is a great shame,” Sanders said. “The president has been clear on what his position is, certainly what his support is for the people and the community of Israel.” Acosta then ask

"Serving President Trump and this country has been the most rewarding experience of my entire life. To be a small part of all this President has done for the American people has truly been an honor. I'm looking forward to working on President Trump's re-election campaign and spending more time with my family," Shine said in a statement. He’s not been in the position all that long, so when I first saw this breaking I was shocked. WH communications director Bill Shine, a former Fox News exec., resigns. — Jim Acosta (@Acosta) March 8, 2019 But, as I suggested in my title, this is really just a transition and not a resignation: Per @PressSec Sarah Sanders: "Bill Shine offered his resignation to the President yesterday evening, and the President accepted. Bill continues to support President Trump and his agenda and will serve as Senior Advisor to the 2020 re-election campaign." — David Martosko (@dmartosko) March 8, 2019 Trump quote after Bill S

Sarah Sanders took questions from reporters today for the first time in a while in an official press briefing,  returning to the podium after President Trump said he had instructed her “not to bother” giving briefings for a while, citing inaccurate coverage. During the briefing, she explained why Trump reopened the government: “The President has opened the government on the basis that Democrats have signaled to us that they're willing to actually get serious about a real deal and get serious about fixing the border.”  See also:  Judge Jeanine: Trump tries to make decisions that are best for you and me  Here’s more  via Fox News : President Trump agreed to re-open the government for three weeks because Democrats signaled they’re willing to negotiate on border security, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said Monday. “The president opened the government on the basis that Democrats have signaled to us that they’re willing to actually get serious about a r

Sarah Sanders estaba recibiendo preguntas de la prensa esta mañana y un reportero le hizo una pregunta ridícula a Sanders, una que no le gustó nada Reporter: "Was the president encouraging false statements, obstruction, things that are charged in the indictment?" Sanders: "That is probably one of the more ridiculous and insulting questions… frankly, it's just insulting, it's just not true"  pic.twitter.com/SbHqQKceby — TicToc by Bloomberg (@tictoc)  January 25, 2019 AComo dije en mi última publicación, los medios de comunicación se mostrarán salivados acerca de cómo este arresto podría tener algo que ver con Trump, y este es el primer ejemplo que he visto (no he estado despierto mucho tiempo). ¿Sobre qué base se pregunta una pregunta como esta? Se mencionó en la acusación que Stone tuvo contacto con los funcionarios de la campaña de Trump en 2016 (no en los últimos dos años) y que SE manipuló a un testigo, dio declaraciones falsas al Congre

Sarah Sanders hat heute Morgen bei Fox and Friends zugegeben, dass sie sich über die Zahl der an der Südgrenze gefangenen Terroristen geäußert hat. Folgendes sagte sie (bis 5:00 Uhr): Sanders gab zu, dass sie die 4.000 bekannte oder mutmaßliche Terroristen an der Südgrenze begründet hatte, als sie hätte sagen sollen, dass diese Zahl für alle Einstiegspunkte gilt. Sie hat zu diesem Punkt jedoch nicht lange gesagt, was darauf hindeutet, dass jeder Terrorist, der die südliche Grenze überquert, zu viele ist, egal, ob er ein, vier, vierzehn oder viertausend ist. Niemand kann damit argumentieren, aber ich bin froh, dass sie ihren Fehler eingestanden hat.